PropIQ · Case Study
Case Study · Workflow Platform · Multi-role · Enterprise · GeoIQ

Designing One Property Pipeline Across Brokers, BD Teams and Brands

PropIQ is my case-study name for MarketConnect, the property-sourcing workflow I designed at GeoIQ.

MarketConnect turns property leads submitted by field brokers into structured, reviewable data — coordinating brokers, brand BD teams and brand workspaces around one pipeline, from first submission to a go/no-go decision.

Role Lead product designer on MarketConnect, owning the property submission flow, the multi-stage review and quality-gate system, the broker and BD/ops interfaces, and the catchment-mapping and collaboration tools — working closely with product and engineering at GeoIQ.
3 roles
brand workspace, BD/ops, field broker — one system
2 steps
to submit a new property from the field
11 steps
structured assessment gating deeper review
01 / The job PropIQ supports

When a retail brand expands into a new market, someone has to find the right property — walk the street, check the frontage, confirm the rent, judge whether the location fits what the brand needs. That sourcing work doesn't happen from one office. It's distributed across field brokers and BD staff, working across several brands and markets at once. MarketConnect is the system that coordinates that work.

02 / What made the old workflow hard

A property lead is only useful if someone can act on it

A broker finding a promising site has no built-in reason to format it neatly — a photo, a price, an address is often all that reaches the brand side. That's workable for one lead. It gets harder to manage once submissions are coming in for several brands and markets at once, each with its own requirements: without shared structure, a BD reviewer has no consistent way to compare one submission against another or tell whether it has what a decision actually needs. The bottleneck wasn't finding properties. It was giving every submission enough shared structure to be compared, reviewed and acted on.

03 / The reframe

Treat every submission as a record moving through stages, not a one-off message

The shift was to stop designing around the moment a broker sends a lead, and start designing around the property's whole lifecycle — submitted, matched to a requirement, scored, reviewed, decided. Every role touching that property needed to see the same record at the stage it was actually in, instead of piecing it together from separate threads.


04 / Two roles, two interfaces

A broker's phone and a BD team's desk needed different tools, on the same data

A field broker works from a phone, moving between sites — their view is a list of client workspaces, each with its own requirements and properties. A BD or ops reviewer works from a desk, comparing many markets at once — their view is a table paired with a live map, sortable by priority and status. Same pipeline, two interfaces built for how each role actually works.

MarketConnect desktop dashboard: a Markets & Properties table listing priority and status for each market, paired with a live map view of Bengaluru, plus tabs for My Markets and My Properties.
Broker's mobile Leads screen listing separate client workspaces — each with its own requirement and property counts and a status such as Active or Changes required.
BD / Ops
MarketConnect — a sortable table of markets and properties, layered over a map, for comparing many locations at once.
Field broker
A leads list organized by client workspace, so one broker can work several brands' requirements without losing track of either.

05 / Guiding a submission before it happens

Catch a weak submission before it enters the queue

Property submission is two steps — location, then rent, carpet area, possession status and photos. Rather than let an incomplete submission go straight into review and get rejected later, MarketConnect checks it at the point of submission and tells the broker what would strengthen it: missing facade photos, a signage photo that would raise visibility, or confirmation that carpet area and rent already look right. The broker chooses — fix it now, or submit anyway.

Add property, step 2 of 2 — rent, carpet area, possession status, available-from date, floor and a photo upload field, with a Submit button.
A review popover reading 'See how to improve this property' — suggesting more facade photos and a signage photo, confirming carpet area and rent already look right, with Submit anyway and Fix now buttons.
06 / How the system handles complexity as review deepens

Not every property needs the same amount of scrutiny

A submitted property starts at L0. Moving it further — toward L1 review, on-hold, or rejected — isn't a dropdown flip. Changing status triggers a required structured assessment: 11 steps covering basic site information through to competitor analysis and market overview, so a property can't advance to a deeper review stage without the data that stage actually needs to make a call.

Property detail screen with a status field open, showing L0 review pending, On-hold, Rejected and L1 review pending as options.
Confirmation modal: 'In order to confirm the status change, you will have to fill further details,' with Cancel and Fill details now.
Structured assessment form, step 1 of 11 — basic site information including site code, timestamp, email, name and market or landmark.
Same assessment form, step 8 of 11 — competitor analysis and market overview, asking for organized and unorganized competitor counts within 250 metres.
← scroll →
07 / What the final operational workflow looks like

A property only means something in the context of its market

Every requirement sits inside a catchment map, with competitor brands, existing markets, other properties and complementary brands each toggleable as a layer — so a review isn't judging one address in isolation, it's judging its position against everything around it. A requirement can also be shared directly with the specific brokers already working it, so a reviewer knows who's involved without another message thread.

Catchment map for a requirement with a My Layer panel toggling Competitor brands, Markets, Properties and Complimentary brands.
Requirement detail screen with locality, carpet area, possession, rent budget and amenities, and a Shared with list showing the brokers already assigned to it (names blurred for privacy).
08 / What changed, and what I'd revisit

MarketConnect didn't reduce how much work goes into finding and vetting a property — that part is still real, human work. What changed is that the work became visible and comparable: every submission carries the same structure, every stage change carries the data that stage needs, and a broker, a BD reviewer and a brand workspace are all looking at the same record instead of a fragmented thread.

If I revisited it now, I'd want tighter feedback loops on why a submission stalls at a review stage instead of just showing its current status, and a lighter version of the 11-step gate for properties that clearly don't need that much scrutiny — right now every property earns the same depth of process, whether or not it needs it.